Headline posts
TO THE FORE WITH THE TANKS! (August 20, 2018 10:56 am)
THE LESSONS OF HAMEL (August 1, 2018 3:41 pm)
Mark II


February 24, 2017

For many years it was widely believed that the eight tanks that fought in Gaza with E Company, Heavy Branch Machine Gun Corps (later renamed the Palestine Tank Detachment) were a mixture of Mark I and Mark II tanks. However, this information may not be correct.  

Kia Ora has the rounded track adjustment apertures.

Kia Ora has the rounded track adjustment apertures.

This seems to stem from Colonel J.F.C. Fuller’s 1920 book ‘Tanks in the Great War 1914-1918’.  Fuller was the principal staff officer at Tank Corps headquarters in France during the war, and the chapters about Palestine were written with the assistance of Major Odo Forsyth-Major, the Detachment second in command.

As a result Fuller’s statement “The tanks engaged were Mark I’s and II’s” has often been taken at face value.  Due to the small number of tanks sent to Palestine and their limited impact on the campaign there has been very little detailed study of this unit by historians.  More recent research, however, has shown that all eight tanks were in fact Mark I vehicles.

The evenly spaced rivets above the cab can be seen on War Baby, Nutty, Pincher and Tiger.

The evenly spaced rivets above the cab can be seen on War Baby, Nutty, Pincher and Tiger.

Their names are not in question.  They were: Sir Archibald, Otazel, Pincher and Ole Luk Oie (Male tanks) and War Baby, Kia Ora, Nutty and Tiger (Females).

The Mark II tank was intended for use in training, not combat like the Mark I.  As a consequence the Mark II was built from mild steel, rather than armour plate.

This doesn’t show up in photographs but there are also visible differences between the two tanks, meaning we can tell them apart.

Mark II tanks featured a slightly narrower cab.  As a result the row of eleven rivets across the front of it were not all the same distance apart – the outer pairs were much closer together.

Mark II

In contrast, this Mark II has uneven rivets and the squared off track adjustment apertures

On the roof the Mark II featured a raised observation hatch shaped like a cheese dish, and the rear of the tank had a bare appearance as the cover for the Mark I’s tail wheel hydraulic jack was removed, as were the wheels.

Another, less obvious difference is the shape of the track adjustment apertures at the front of the track horns.  The Mark I’s are more rounded, the Mark II’s more squared off.

Although some of these photographs are of fairly poor quality they do allow us to identify the tanks as well as providing an invaluable snapshot of life in the Palestine Tank Detachment.

The Tank Museum has the only surviving Mark I tank in The Trench Experience and a Mark II in The Tank Story Hall. Find out more about these vehicles in David Fletcher’s Tank Chats here and here

For a more in depth examination of the campign in Palestine, or for advice if your ancestor served there, check out one of the books below.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Tank Museum on Patreon!


  1. There were definitely no Mk IIs in Palestine.

  2. Since in Tank Chat it is made clear that Mark II tanks were not suitable for action due to their lack of real armour I already
    doubted them beeing sent to Palestine. The hull could be penetrated by machine gun infantry ammo.
    This info is only to be found in appendix VI of Sir Stern’s book. Maybe this shows that not too much attention was given
    to the Palestine Tank Detachment.
    Alas this is not what one hopes to find out studying a book of a tank-master already written in 1919.

Leave A Comment